Skip to content

Conversation

@milan-cb
Copy link
Contributor

@milan-cb milan-cb commented Feb 12, 2025

What changed? Why?

This change will add transaction receipts to contract invocations. After invoking a contract method, this new change will fetch the transaction receipt of the completed transaction and append the receipt contents, within the "content" field of the Transaction model for the Contract Invocation.

Qualified Impact

If there is any issue with this change, the best measure would be to rollback and then fix the error accordingly. This change will affect the content field which is a part of the Transaction model for the Contract Invocation, but there shouldn't be any issues with the structure of model. Even with the strict validation, we will have the required "to" and "from" fields.

@milan-cb milan-cb changed the base branch from v0.18.0-merged to v0.18.0-release-branch February 12, 2025 21:26
Copy link
Contributor

@rohan-agarwal-coinbase rohan-agarwal-coinbase left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just gotta figure out why the tests are failing 🤔 seems something off with github actions

@cb-heimdall
Copy link

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

@milan-cb milan-cb merged commit c815aa4 into v0.18.0-release-branch Feb 13, 2025
8 checks passed
milan-cb added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
…#103)

* chore: fixed casing error for assetids

* new e2e test + backend updates (#101)

* new e2e test + backend updates

* add changes from openapi spec for transaction receipt

* remove cache dependencies install for unit tests

* feat: update changelog & bump version (#104)

* update changelog

* bumped up version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants