Skip to content

Conversation

@tacdom
Copy link
Member

@tacdom tacdom commented Jun 8, 2025

Meeting notes from EU & Asia, May 27th

Signed-off-by Dominik Tacke [email protected]

Signed-off-by Dominik Tacke <[email protected]>
@tacdom tacdom requested a review from a team as a code owner June 8, 2025 19:41
@tacdom
Copy link
Member Author

tacdom commented Jun 8, 2025

@kangaruppel @woodsmc fyi


* What platforms should be considered?
* Will the decision be bound to chips, architectures or capabilities of target platforms?
* What shouöd be the scope: Flexibility / Testability? Having a wide scope of targets will make testing and verifying pretty tedious.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* What shouöd be the scope: Flexibility / Testability? Having a wide scope of targets will make testing and verifying pretty tedious.
* What should be the scope: Flexibility / Testability? Having a wide scope of targets will make testing and verifying pretty tedious.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants