Implement blank_line_after_nested_stub_class preview style (#9155)

## Summary

This PR implements the `blank_line_after_nested_stub_class` preview
style in the formatter.

The logic is divided into 3 parts:
1. In between preceding and following nodes at top level and nested
suite
2. When there's a trailing comment after the class
3. When there is no following node from (1) which is the case when it's
the last or the only node in a suite

We handle (3) with `FormatLeadingAlternateBranchComments`.

## Test Plan

- Add new test cases and update existing snapshots
- Checked the `typeshed` diff

fixes: #8891

Author: dhruvmanila

crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/stub_files/blank_line_after_nested_stub_class.options.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+[
+  {
+    "source_type": "Stub",
+    "preview": "enabled"
+  }
+]

crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/stub_files/blank_line_after_nested_stub_class.pyi

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+class Top1:
+    pass
+class Top2:
+    pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+
+class Top:
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+    class Pass:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+    class_variable = 1
+
+class Top:
+    class TrailingComment:
+        pass
+    # comment
+    class Other:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class CommentWithEllipsis: ...
+    # comment
+    class Other: ...
+
+class Top:
+    class TrailingCommentWithMultipleBlankLines:
+        pass
+
+
+    # comment
+    class Other:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+
+    # comment
+    class LeadingComment:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    @decorator
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+
+class Top:
+    @decorator
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+    @decorator
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+
+class Top:
+    @decorator
+    class Ellipsis: ...
+    @decorator
+    class Pass:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Foo:
+        pass
+
+
+
+
+    class AfterMultipleEmptyLines:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Nested11:
+        class Nested12:
+            pass
+    class Nested21:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Nested11:
+        class Nested12:
+            pass
+        # comment
+    class Nested21:
+        pass
+
+class Top:
+    class Nested11:
+        class Nested12:
+            pass
+    # comment
+    class Nested21:
+        pass
+    # comment
+
+class Top1:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+class Top2:
+    pass
+
+class Top1:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+    # comment
+class Top2:
+    pass
+
+class Top1:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+# comment
+class Top2:
+    pass
+
+if foo:
+    class Nested1:
+        pass
+    class Nested2:
+        pass
+else:
+    pass
+
+if foo:
+    class Nested1:
+        pass
+    class Nested2:
+        pass
+    # comment
+elif bar:
+    class Nested1:
+        pass
+# comment
+else:
+    pass
+
+if top1:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+if top2:
+    pass
+
+if top1:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+    # comment
+if top2:
+    pass
+
+if top1:
+    class Nested:
+        pass
+# comment
+if top2:
+    pass
+
+try:
+    class Try:
+        pass
+except:
+    class Except:
+        pass
+foo = 1
+
+match foo:
+    case 1:
+        class Nested:
+            pass
+    case 2:
+        class Nested:
+            pass
+    case _:
+        class Nested:
+            pass
+foo = 1
+
+class Eof:
+    class Nested:
+        pass

crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/stub_files/blank_line_after_nested_stub_class_eof.options.json

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+[
+  {
+    "source_type": "Stub",
+    "preview": "enabled"
+  }
+]

crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/stub_files/blank_line_after_nested_stub_class_eof.pyi

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# A separate file to test out the behavior when there are a mix of blank lines
+# and comments at EOF just after a nested stub class.
+
+class Top:
+    class Nested1:
+        class Nested12:
+            pass
+        # comment
+    class Nested2:
+        pass
+
+
+
+# comment
+
+
+

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/comments/format.rs

@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 use std::borrow::Cow;
 
 use ruff_formatter::{format_args, write, FormatError, FormatOptions, SourceCode};
-use ruff_python_ast::PySourceType;
-use ruff_python_ast::{AnyNodeRef, AstNode};
+use ruff_python_ast::{AnyNodeRef, AstNode, NodeKind, PySourceType};
 use ruff_python_trivia::{
     is_pragma_comment, lines_after, lines_after_ignoring_trivia, lines_before,
 };
@@ -11,6 +10,8 @@ use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextLen, TextRange};
 use crate::comments::{CommentLinePosition, SourceComment};
 use crate::context::NodeLevel;
 use crate::prelude::*;
+use crate::preview::is_blank_line_after_nested_stub_class_enabled;
+use crate::statement::suite::should_insert_blank_line_after_class_in_stub_file;
 
 /// Formats the leading comments of a node.
 pub(crate) fn leading_node_comments<T>(node: &T) -> FormatLeadingComments
@@ -85,7 +86,11 @@ pub(crate) struct FormatLeadingAlternateBranchComments<'a> {
 
 impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatLeadingAlternateBranchComments<'_> {
     fn fmt(&self, f: &mut PyFormatter) -> FormatResult<()> {
-        if let Some(first_leading) = self.comments.first() {
+        if self.last_node.map_or(false, |preceding| {
+            should_insert_blank_line_after_class_in_stub_file(preceding, None, f.context())
+        }) {
+            write!(f, [empty_line(), leading_comments(self.comments)])?;
+        } else if let Some(first_leading) = self.comments.first() {
             // Leading comments only preserves the lines after the comment but not before.
             // Insert the necessary lines.
             write!(
@@ -513,14 +518,32 @@ fn strip_comment_prefix(comment_text: &str) -> FormatResult<&str> {
 /// ```
 ///
 /// This builder will insert two empty lines before the comment.
+///
+/// # Preview
+///
+/// For preview style, this builder will insert a single empty line after a
+/// class definition in a stub file.
+///
+/// For example, given:
+/// ```python
+/// class Foo:
+///     pass
+/// # comment
+/// ```
+///
+/// This builder will insert a single empty line before the comment.
 pub(crate) fn empty_lines_before_trailing_comments<'a>(
     f: &PyFormatter,
     comments: &'a [SourceComment],
+    node_kind: NodeKind,
 ) -> FormatEmptyLinesBeforeTrailingComments<'a> {
     // Black has different rules for stub vs. non-stub and top level vs. indented
     let empty_lines = match (f.options().source_type(), f.context().node_level()) {
         (PySourceType::Stub, NodeLevel::TopLevel(_)) => 1,
-        (PySourceType::Stub, _) => 0,
+        (PySourceType::Stub, _) => u32::from(
+            is_blank_line_after_nested_stub_class_enabled(f.context())
+                && node_kind == NodeKind::StmtClassDef,
+        ),
         (_, NodeLevel::TopLevel(_)) => 2,
         (_, _) => 1,
     };

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/preview.rs

@@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ pub(crate) const fn is_wrap_multiple_context_managers_in_parens_enabled(
     context.is_preview()
 }
 
+/// Returns `true` if the [`blank_line_after_nested_stub_class`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8891) preview style is enabled.
+pub(crate) const fn is_blank_line_after_nested_stub_class_enabled(
+    context: &PyFormatContext,
+) -> bool {
+    context.is_preview()
+}
+
 /// Returns `true` if the [`module_docstring_newlines`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7995) preview style is enabled.
 pub(crate) const fn is_module_docstring_newlines_enabled(context: &PyFormatContext) -> bool {
     context.is_preview()

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/statement/stmt_class_def.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 use ruff_formatter::write;
-use ruff_python_ast::{Decorator, StmtClassDef};
+use ruff_python_ast::{Decorator, NodeKind, StmtClassDef};
 use ruff_python_trivia::lines_after_ignoring_end_of_line_trivia;
 use ruff_text_size::Ranged;
 
@@ -152,7 +152,10 @@ impl FormatNodeRule<StmtClassDef> for FormatStmtClassDef {
         //
         // # comment
         // ```
-        empty_lines_before_trailing_comments(f, comments.trailing(item)).fmt(f)
+        empty_lines_before_trailing_comments(f, comments.trailing(item), NodeKind::StmtClassDef)
+            .fmt(f)?;
+
+        Ok(())
     }
 
     fn fmt_dangling_comments(

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/statement/stmt_function_def.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 use ruff_formatter::write;
-use ruff_python_ast::StmtFunctionDef;
+use ruff_python_ast::{NodeKind, StmtFunctionDef};
 
 use crate::comments::format::{
     empty_lines_after_leading_comments, empty_lines_before_trailing_comments,
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ impl FormatNodeRule<StmtFunctionDef> for FormatStmtFunctionDef {
         //
         // # comment
         // ```
-        empty_lines_before_trailing_comments(f, comments.trailing(item)).fmt(f)
+        empty_lines_before_trailing_comments(f, comments.trailing(item), NodeKind::StmtFunctionDef)
+            .fmt(f)
     }
 
     fn fmt_dangling_comments(