Skip to content

Conversation

@Dandandan
Copy link
Contributor

@Dandandan Dandandan commented Apr 24, 2021

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #51 .

Rationale for this change

Arro kernels are implemented and tested and should be used when available.
Use more of arrows kernels to benefit more from arrow performance / potential future perf improvements.

What changes are included in this PR?

Use more of arrows kernels to benefit more from arrow speed / potential improvements.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@Dandandan Dandandan changed the title Use arrow eq kernels Use arrow eq kernels in casewhen Apr 24, 2021
@Dandandan Dandandan changed the title Use arrow eq kernels in casewhen Use arrow eq kernels in CaseWhen expression evaluation Apr 24, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #52 (53f8fc8) into master (9ba214a) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 16.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #52      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.24%   76.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines       23051    23052       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        17576    17576              
- Misses       5475     5476       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
datafusion/src/physical_plan/expressions/case.rs 72.91% <16.66%> (-0.39%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9ba214a...53f8fc8. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yap, simpler and likely more efficient 👍

Thanks a lot, @Dandandan !

@andygrove andygrove merged commit 1f1130e into apache:master Apr 25, 2021
@houqp houqp added ballista enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 29, 2021
ewgenius pushed a commit to ewgenius/datafusion that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
fix: More dangling references (apache#54)

* fix: More dangling references

* test: Add tests for remove_dangling_identifiers

UPSTREAM NOTE: This PR was attempted to be upstreamed in apache#13405 - but it was not accepted due to the complexity it brought. Phillip needs to figure out what a good solution that solves our problem and can be upstreamed is.
aditanase pushed a commit to hstack/datafusion that referenced this pull request May 18, 2025
fix: More dangling references (apache#54)

* fix: More dangling references

* test: Add tests for remove_dangling_identifiers

UPSTREAM NOTE: This PR was attempted to be upstreamed in apache#13405 - but it was not accepted due to the complexity it brought. Phillip needs to figure out what a good solution that solves our problem and can be upstreamed is.
H0TB0X420 pushed a commit to H0TB0X420/datafusion that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2025
* feat: impl a new Config class

* fix: add u64 support for config
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use arrow eq kernels in CaseWhen expression evaluation

5 participants