You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a host agent running on one Lambda, and remote agents running on separate Lambdas in our current serverless architecture. However, we are facing limitations due to cold starts — both on the host Lambda and the remote agents — which leads to significant response delays and, at times, even timeouts.
Given these challenges, we’re looking for guidance on how to achieve seamless performance with A2A in a serverless setup. Is this architecture feasible for agentic workflows, or would a server-based architecture be the more reliable option for managing these workflows?
Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We have a host agent running on one Lambda, and remote agents running on separate Lambdas in our current serverless architecture. However, we are facing limitations due to cold starts — both on the host Lambda and the remote agents — which leads to significant response delays and, at times, even timeouts.
Given these challenges, we’re looking for guidance on how to achieve seamless performance with A2A in a serverless setup. Is this architecture feasible for agentic workflows, or would a server-based architecture be the more reliable option for managing these workflows?
Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions