Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've updated the DMOD proposal. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've updated the DMOD proposal. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Having read the DMOD specifications of this page, I was wondering if it wouldn't be simpler to consider the DMOD section as a complete definition of the default modulators?
Currently this section is considered to be an override of the default modulators already specified in the 2.04 specifications: the default modulators should be applied first, then those of the DMOD section.
The problem is that the default modulators slightly changed between 2.01 and 2.04 (velocity to cut off frequency) so even with the DMOD section there is room for a small ambiguity.
To the contrary, we could consider that if at least one default modulator is set in the DMOD section, all default modulators coming from the 2.04 specifications will be ignored. In this case, we know exactly what is happening. The only drawback I see is when we want NO default modulators.
An alternative can also be: if the DMOD section is in the file, may it be empty, then we ignore all default modulators.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions