Replies: 2 comments
-
|
@vipinvkmenon @diya-dhan can you check this issue of @stef-73 ? As we are in beta a change of the schema is not a big issue if needed |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Hi @stef-73 , The current resource tries to match with the API behind it. In BTP, there are separate APIs that handle the creation of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
I'm about to import some existing groups from SCI for getting them under terraform control (to be more precise: opentofu). The import is straight forward, but as I don't have and not want to have the users in the terraform repo, the resources created will either delete existing user assignment or I risk getting a drift by adding users to groups outside terraform. I'm not sure if the current design of the group attributes with the assignment to users is the right way? Maybe it's a better approach to separate user assignment from the group data? Something similar is done in the BTP provider with the role_collection resource and the role_collection_assignment resource separated.
I've found a workaround by using data source sci_group, but this is a little bit weird.
KInd regards,
Stefan
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions