Commits: JuliaLang/julia@6151f740285fae17f180cd4ecab606b3411adb0f vs JuliaLang/julia@529ac5170277cdb654ce03698675ef27d99d1fab
Comparison Diff: link
Triggered By: link
Tag Predicate: "inference"
Note: If Chrome is your browser, I strongly recommend installing the Wide GitHub extension, which makes the result table easier to read.
Below is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks found in
JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl. The values
listed in the ID column have the structure [parent_group, child_group, ..., key],
and can be used to index into the BaseBenchmarks suite to retrieve the corresponding
benchmarks.
The percentages accompanying time and memory values in the below table are noise tolerances. The "true" time/memory value for a given benchmark is expected to fall within this percentage of the reported value.
A ratio greater than 1.0 denotes a possible regression (marked with ❌), while a ratio less
than 1.0 denotes a possible improvement (marked with ✅). Only significant results - results
that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all
benchmark results remained invariant between builds).
| ID | time ratio | memory ratio |
|---|---|---|
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "abstract_call_gf_by_type"] |
0.92 (5%) ✅ | 0.96 (1%) ✅ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "construct_ssa!"] |
0.92 (5%) ✅ | 0.96 (1%) ✅ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "domsort_ssa!"] |
0.92 (5%) ✅ | 0.96 (1%) ✅ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "println(::QuoteNode)"] |
0.96 (5%) | 0.96 (1%) ✅ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "rand(Float64)"] |
0.95 (5%) | 0.97 (1%) ✅ |
["inference", "abstract interpretation", "sin(42)"] |
0.94 (5%) ✅ | 0.95 (1%) ✅ |
["inference", "abstract_call_gf_by_type"] |
1.07 (5%) ❌ | 1.00 (1%) |
["inference", "optimization", "abstract_call_gf_by_type"] |
1.12 (5%) ❌ | 1.07 (1%) ❌ |
Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
["inference", "abstract interpretation"]["inference"]["inference", "optimization"]
Julia Version 1.9.0-DEV.187
Commit 6151f74028 (2022-03-14 12:53 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
uname: Linux 5.4.0-94-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 6 23:58:14 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3434 MHz 197606 s 408 s 38616 s 51408030 s 0 s
#2 3588 MHz 4013616 s 516 s 166122 s 47494698 s 0 s
#3 3404 MHz 184801 s 376 s 31344 s 51449490 s 0 s
#4 3321 MHz 128954 s 417 s 30376 s 51269289 s 0 s
Memory: 31.32097625732422 GB (14363.01171875 MB free)
Uptime: 5.17169531e6 sec
Load Avg: 1.0 1.07 1.04
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
Threads: 1 on 4 virtual cores
Julia Version 1.9.0-DEV.185
Commit 529ac51702 (2022-03-14 11:56 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
uname: Linux 5.4.0-94-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 6 23:58:14 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3545 MHz 197692 s 408 s 38638 s 51415804 s 0 s
#2 3668 MHz 4020562 s 516 s 166224 s 47495547 s 0 s
#3 3506 MHz 185581 s 376 s 31371 s 51456578 s 0 s
#4 3502 MHz 129038 s 417 s 30388 s 51277067 s 0 s
Memory: 31.32097625732422 GB (14383.99609375 MB free)
Uptime: 5.17248501e6 sec
Load Avg: 1.03 1.03 1.01
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-13.0.1 (ORCJIT, haswell)
Threads: 1 on 4 virtual cores