-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 381
[GSK-1956] Moved target validation and silenced it for LLMs #1531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aba6ac4
moved target validation and silenced it for LLMs
rabah-khalek 049e66d
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
rabah-khalek 04a431b
fixing tests
rabah-khalek 6b7d3f8
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
rabah-khalek 97f6737
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
mattbit 75dc072
explicit check for ds.target
rabah-khalek 7683267
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
rabah-khalek 520f41f
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
mattbit 7d43b6a
fixed tests
rabah-khalek 6f255fc
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
rabah-khalek f92d720
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
mattbit 75b91e9
Merge branch 'main' into GSK-1956-2
mattbit File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need this in
validate_model???There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should refactor
model_validationanddataset_validationinto one commonvalidation, but the way the code is structured right now, I neededmodel.meta.model_typeto dovalidate_optional_targetfor non-LLM models.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's just fix the llm-warning issue for now and deal with the refactoring post-release, I added a card here: https://linear.app/giskard/issue/GSK-2064/refactor-model-and-dataset-validation