@@ -2548,7 +2548,6 @@ route_map_result_t route_map_apply_ext(struct route_map *map,
25482548 struct route_map_index * index = NULL ;
25492549 struct route_map_rule * set = NULL ;
25502550 bool skip_match_clause = false;
2551- struct prefix conv ;
25522551
25532552 if (recursion > RMAP_RECURSION_LIMIT ) {
25542553 if (map )
@@ -2571,31 +2570,14 @@ route_map_result_t route_map_apply_ext(struct route_map *map,
25712570
25722571 map -> applied ++ ;
25732572
2574- /*
2575- * Handling for matching evpn_routes in the prefix table.
2576- *
2577- * We convert type2/5 prefix to ipv4/6 prefix to do longest
2578- * prefix matching on.
2579- */
25802573 if (prefix -> family == AF_EVPN ) {
2581- if (evpn_prefix2prefix (prefix , & conv ) != 0 ) {
2582- if (unlikely (CHECK_FLAG (rmap_debug ,
2583- DEBUG_ROUTEMAP_DETAIL )))
2584- zlog_debug (
2585- "Unable to convert EVPN prefix %pFX into IPv4/IPv6 prefix. Falling back to non-optimized route-map lookup" ,
2586- prefix );
2587- } else {
2588- if (unlikely (CHECK_FLAG (rmap_debug ,
2589- DEBUG_ROUTEMAP_DETAIL )))
2590- zlog_debug (
2591- "Converted EVPN prefix %pFX into %pFX for optimized route-map lookup" ,
2592- prefix , & conv );
2593-
2594- prefix = & conv ;
2595- }
2574+ index = map -> head ;
2575+ } else {
2576+ skip_match_clause = true;
2577+ index = route_map_get_index (map , prefix , match_object ,
2578+ & match_ret );
25962579 }
25972580
2598- index = route_map_get_index (map , prefix , match_object , & match_ret );
25992581 if (index ) {
26002582 index -> applied ++ ;
26012583 if (unlikely (CHECK_FLAG (rmap_debug , DEBUG_ROUTEMAP )))
@@ -2619,7 +2601,6 @@ route_map_result_t route_map_apply_ext(struct route_map *map,
26192601 ret = RMAP_DENYMATCH ;
26202602 goto route_map_apply_end ;
26212603 }
2622- skip_match_clause = true;
26232604
26242605 for (; index ; index = index -> next ) {
26252606 if (!skip_match_clause ) {
0 commit comments