[CMIS]Fix low-power to high power mode transition#268
Merged
prgeor merged 5 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom May 4, 2022
Merged
[CMIS]Fix low-power to high power mode transition#268prgeor merged 5 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
prgeor merged 5 commits intosonic-net:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
@aravindmani-1 can you review? |
aravindmani-1
previously approved these changes
Mar 10, 2022
qinchuanares
approved these changes
May 4, 2022
Collaborator
Author
|
@rlhui could you please cherry pick this PR to 20211? |
itamar-talmon
pushed a commit
to itamar-talmon/sonic-platform-common
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
* [CMIS]Fix low-power to high power mode transition * Remove python2 tests * Improve code coverage * Parametrize the test * Improve code coverage
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Motivation and Context
In Arista switch, 400G ZR module did not transition from LowPwr -> HighPwr. This is because LowPwrAllowRequestHW =1 by default, meaning the module LowPwr state could still be controlled by LowPwrRequestHW signal
How Has This Been Tested?