From 173c2e8e26a5b8513c02ce4c330a5e05a79c4fc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sonic Build Admin Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 03:20:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove test_radv_ipv6_ra.py xfail for v6 topos ### Description of PR Remove xfail because the test can pass on v6 topos after garp fix: https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/pull/21155 Summary: Fixes # (issue) ### Type of change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement) - [ ] New Test case - [ ] Skipped for non-supported platforms - [x] Test case improvement ### Back port request - [x] 202412 - [x] 202505 ### Approach #### What is the motivation for this PR? The test case can pass with the fix from https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/pull/21155 #### How did you do it? Remove xfail in tests_mark_conditions.yaml #### How did you verify/test it? The test passed on v6 topo after removing xfail #### Any platform specific information? #### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case? v6 topos ### Documentation Signed-off-by: Sonic Build Admin --- .../conditional_mark/tests_mark_conditions.yaml | 16 ++++------------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/common/plugins/conditional_mark/tests_mark_conditions.yaml b/tests/common/plugins/conditional_mark/tests_mark_conditions.yaml index bc68faf1f..0a2903f25 100644 --- a/tests/common/plugins/conditional_mark/tests_mark_conditions.yaml +++ b/tests/common/plugins/conditional_mark/tests_mark_conditions.yaml @@ -3519,18 +3519,14 @@ qos/test_tunnel_qos_remap.py::test_pfc_watermark_extra_lossless_standby: ####################################### radv/test_radv_ipv6_ra.py::test_radv_router_advertisement: xfail: - reason: "xfail for IPv6-only topologies, need to added support for IPv6-only. Or test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." - conditions_logical_operator: or + reason: "Test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." conditions: - - "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/19924 and '-v6-' in topo_name" - "'t0-isolated-d256u256s2' in topo_name and platform in ['x86_64-nvidia_sn5640-r0']" radv/test_radv_ipv6_ra.py::test_solicited_router_advertisement: xfail: - reason: "xfail for IPv6-only topologies, need to added support for IPv6-only. Or test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." - conditions_logical_operator: or + reason: "Test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." conditions: - - "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/19924 and '-v6-' in topo_name" - "'t0-isolated-d256u256s2' in topo_name and platform in ['x86_64-nvidia_sn5640-r0']" radv/test_radv_ipv6_ra.py::test_solicited_router_advertisement_with_m_flag: @@ -3539,10 +3535,8 @@ radv/test_radv_ipv6_ra.py::test_solicited_router_advertisement_with_m_flag: conditions: - "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/11322 and 'dualtor-64' in topo_name" xfail: - reason: "xfail for IPv6-only topologies, need to added support for IPv6-only. Or test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." - conditions_logical_operator: or + reason: "Test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." conditions: - - "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/19924 and '-v6-' in topo_name" - "'t0-isolated-d256u256s2' in topo_name and platform in ['x86_64-nvidia_sn5640-r0']" radv/test_radv_ipv6_ra.py::test_unsolicited_router_advertisement_with_m_flag: @@ -3551,10 +3545,8 @@ radv/test_radv_ipv6_ra.py::test_unsolicited_router_advertisement_with_m_flag: conditions: - "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/11322 and 'dualtor-64' in topo_name" xfail: - reason: "xfail for IPv6-only topologies, need to added support for IPv6-only. Or test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." - conditions_logical_operator: or + reason: "Test case has issue on the t0-isolated-d256u256s2 topo." conditions: - - "https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/issues/19924 and '-v6-' in topo_name" - "'t0-isolated-d256u256s2' in topo_name and platform in ['x86_64-nvidia_sn5640-r0']" #######################################