-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 474
Do Not Modify Function Language for dotnet-isolated worker runtime in workflowApp #11486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -123,14 +123,17 @@ public async Task CodelessFunction_CanUse_SingleJavaLanguageProviders() | |||||
| /// Runs tests with Node language provider function. | ||||||
|
||||||
| /// Runs tests with Node language provider function. | |
| /// Runs tests with multiple language providers (C# and JavaScript) to verify workflowApp behavior with different worker runtimes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment states "For Logic Apps, we want to keep the language as DotNetAssembly to avoid breaking changes," but based on the PR description and the implementation, the more accurate statement would be: "For Logic Apps (workflowApp), preserve the original function language metadata without modification." The current implementation prevents any language modification for Logic Apps, not just keeping it as DotNetAssembly specifically.