mm: add preempt points into __purge_vmap_area_lazy()

Use cond_resched_lock to avoid holding the vmap_area_lock for a
potentially long time and thus creating bad latencies for various
workloads.

[hch: split from a larger patch by Joel, wrote the crappy changelog]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: John Dias <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Author: Joel Fernandes

mm/vmalloc.c

@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 	struct llist_node *valist;
 	struct vmap_area *va;
 	struct vmap_area *n_va;
-	int nr = 0;
+	bool do_free = false;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vmap_purge_lock);
 
@@ -638,18 +638,22 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 			start = va->va_start;
 		if (va->va_end > end)
 			end = va->va_end;
-		nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+		do_free = true;
 	}
 
-	if (!nr)
+	if (!do_free)
 		return false;
 
-	atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
 	flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
 
 	spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
-	llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list)
+	llist_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, valist, purge_list) {
+		int nr = (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
 		__free_vmap_area(va);
+		atomic_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
+		cond_resched_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
+	}
 	spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
 	return true;
 }